Anatomy of the Novel:
Women, Meat & Meaning
_______________________________________________________
Abstract
The idea of male domination in society has always been a constant and
reoccurring theme woven into the relationships that people have with one another, as well
as the relationships humans have with non-human animals. Patriarchy exists as an
avenue to establish norms within a society, and its power of implementation is broad and
deep, backed by years of adherence and limited recourse. I believe that by examining
Ruth Ozeki’s novel My Year of Meats, while inspecting scholarly resources that define
and expose patriarchal roots and implementations, it is evident that Ozeki’s novel is an
attack to discredit and devalue the assimilation of the male gaze. Once the parameters of
patriarchy are defined through articles written by Carol Adams, Kathryn George, and
Marlene Longenecker (among others), a close reading of Ozeki’s text reveals to the
audience the struggles that exist for women and non-human animals in a narrative,
personable fashion.
Particularly striking is the transformations that the central female characters in
Ozeki’s novel undertake. Not content with the submissive or derogatory limitations built
around them, the female characters of Lara, Dyann, Akiko, and Jane all show remarkable
fortitude and bravery to fight for equal status and recognition afforded their male
counterparts. Ruth Ozeki is using her novel to provide a template of alternatives for
women and non-humans to use to help eliminate the crippling nature of male domination.
My Year of Meats is a practical extension to show why this equality is vital to
establishing and sustaining a rich, diverse, and vibrant society.